ZweigWhite CE News Structural Engineer Rebuilding America's Infrastructure  
 
SEARCH  GO




Feedback revamp

November 2009 » Exclusive


By Bruce Haldors

Requesting feedback from clients is nothing new to Transpo Group. Previously, we surveyed our “top” clients every couple of years and discovered what one might imagine: Our services were valued and this select group would choose to work with us again. Shocking, right? While this was certainly affirming, we decided our approach needed to be revamped because the number of clients surveyed was far too limited and the request for feedback far too infrequent.

This year, we have taken client feedback surveys to another level. We now request feedback from all of our clients on a regular basis. We survey clients at the beginning of a project, periodically throughout the project (depending on its duration), and at project completion. We even request feedback from prospective clients who asked for a proposal and, for whatever reason, elected not to contract with us. It takes a couple minutes or less to complete our surveys and most of the questions can be answered using a sliding numeric scale. Using a web-based survey tool and creating customized surveys has made it easy for us to request feedback and for our clients to provide feedback. And while it certainly does not — and should not — replace close and regular communication with a client, we find it gives clients a means to provide constructive feedback — feedback they may not otherwise provide without the invitation.

Since February 2009, we have surveyed more than 240 clients and have received feedback to nearly 700 questions. We review all responses and quickly follow-up with any client whose expectations were not met or exceeded. We have found that our clients rarely report unmet expectations — approximately 97 percent of all responses have indicated expectations were either met or exceeded. While this feedback is equally affirming, this time around we know the source is much more comprehensive and the feedback is more timely.

We have found tremendous benefits in surveying clients in this way and with this regularity. It not only demonstrates that we take client feedback seriously and seek continuously to improve, but it also has created a database of “actionable intelligence.” We now know what is most important to clients, what we might do differently next time, and in what areas we can focus our energies to meet client expectations all the more.

Bruce Haldors is president of Transpo Group, Kirkland, Wash. He can be contacted at bruce.haldors@transpogroup.com.

 
Related Engineering Channels




Headlines From Around The Web

Paved, but Still Alive (New York Times)
Blog: Panama Canal Expansion: A Game Changer (Transportation Issues Daily)
Plans envision Pittsburgh 'Aerotropolis' (Pittsburgh Business Times)
GAI Consultants Makes Acquisition (Inside Indiana Business)




Professional Network








Current Issue


Exclusive

Civil engineering industry outlook - Part 1

While 2011 didn't offer too much progress in an economic turnaround, it seems that many people in the architecture, engineering, planning (A/E/P) and environmental consulting industries are adjusting to challenges. For 2012, increased stability is expected, although large changes don't seem likely.


News



New & Noteworthy


Progressive Engineering


Editor's Comment


ZweigWhite Upcoming Events

Environmental Connection 2012
Date: February 26, 2012 - February 29, 2012
Location: Las Vegas

Principals Academy
Date: March 8, 2012 - March 9, 2012
Location: Ft. Lauderdale FL

Geosynthetic Reinforced Retaining Wall Failures and Their Remediation
Date: March 13, 2012 - March 13, 2012
Location: Folsom PA

2012 Sustainable Water Management Conference
Date: March 18, 2012 - March 21, 2012
Location: Portland OR

Ninth National Conference on Transportation Asset Management
Date: April 16, 2012 - April 18, 2012
Location: San Diego


Events