ZweigWhite CE News Structural Engineer Rebuilding America's Infrastructure  
 
SEARCH  GO




Changing channels

September 2008 » Feature Articles

The Auburn Dam project on the North Fork of the American River, started in the mid-1960s, resulted in dewatering of approximately a 1-mile reach of the river near the town of Auburn, Calif. The local water provider’s intake and pump station were removed to accommodate dam construction activities. However, in the late 1970s, seismic, environmental, and cost-sharing concerns resulted in cessation of construction activities. WHPacific was retained to design both the restoration of this river reach and a permanent water-diversion facility for the local water provider.

By George Slovensky and Alan Stroppini

Project
American River intake structure and channel restoration

Civil engineer
WHPacific, Inc., Lakewood, Colo.

Product application
Large-scale physical and computer-based models help engineers design a water-diversion structure while restoring a river channel

Multi-use diversion structure provides a permanent water supply for local communities and restores the American River to its historic channel at the Auburn Dam Site


The American River descends from the crest of the Sierra Nevada Mountains near Lake Tahoe to join the Sacramento River near downtown Sacramento, Calif. The Auburn Dam project on the North Fork of the American River, started in the mid-1960s, resulted in dewatering of approximately a 1-mile reach of the river near the town of Auburn, Calif. The local water provider’s intake and pump station were removed to accommodate dam construction activities. In the late 1970s, seismic, environmental, and cost-sharing concerns resulted in cessation of construction activities. WHPacific was retained to design both the restoration of this river reach and a permanent water-diversion facility for the local water provider.


A tunnel built in 1968 and a temporary earth-fill dam built in 1975 diverted the American River’s flow around the Auburn Dam construction site, dewatering a 1-mile stretch of the river (evident in the left-center of the photo).

Congress authorized the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) to construct the Auburn Dam on the North Fork of the American River in 1965. Construction began on a 33-foot-diameter tunnel to divert the river around the dam construction site in 1968. In 1975, a 265-foot-high temporary earth fill dam (cofferdam) was completed, which forced the river into the recently completed diversion tunnel. This action dewatered an approximate 1-mile reach of the river. A large water intake and pump station owned by Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) were removed as part of the project and the USBR began providing water to PCWA with temporary intake, pump, and piping facilities.

That same year, an earthquake occurred near Oroville, Calif., about 50 miles north of the dam site. This raised concerns about the seismic nature of the fault systems that exist along the foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountain range near the dam site. Construction work on the dam was temporarily halted as the USBR re-evaluated the seismicity of the site and implications for the proposed dam.

Environmental and cost-sharing concerns caused further delays. In 1986, record flood flows overtopped and breached the cofferdam, depositing an estimated 2 million cubic yards of rock and debris into the river reach below, dramatically altering the channel.

Following failure of the original cofferdam in 1986, a smaller temporary dam was built. But it was regularly overtopped by high river flows, such as this flood in 1997.



Following the failure of the original cofferdam, a much smaller temporary dam was constructed to raise river levels enough to facilitate diversions to the temporary pumping system. This cofferdam was overtopped fairly regularly by high river flows, which continued to erode significant amounts of rock and sediment from the dam and deposit it downstream.

By the mid 1990s, Placer County had become one of the fastest growing areas in the nation and the temporary pumping facilities provided by the USBR for the previous 20 years were no longer adequate to meet year-round demands. The temporary system had limited flow capacity and had to be removed each year to protect it from winter floods. Vulnerability to floods, high costs, and inability to meet demand led PCWA and the federal government to begin investigating alternatives for a new permanent diversion structure and pumping plant.

Design challenges

A large-scale physical model of the river reach at the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Hydraulics Laboratory in Denver was used to evaluate options for cofferdam regrading, overall reach geometry, and sediment transport characteristics.
WHPacific was part of the project team from an early stage, helping evaluate alternatives for restoring the river through the dam site and provide a permanent, reliable diversion facility. Design was complicated by the presence of the massive cofferdam remnant and downstream deposits of debris from its failure. Combined, these factors created aggressive hydraulic conditions on an unstable river bed. Nevertheless, complete removal of the cofferdam remnant and the debris from its failure was not feasible financially. Ultimately, a plan was developed that combined limited re-grading of the cofferdam remnant with grade stabilizing structures in the river.

A permanent and reliable water supply intake was designed that would withstand heavy sediment loads and provide the desired capacity, including future expansion. This intake also meets environmental requirements related to fish exclusion and bypass flows and allows fish and boat passage through the newly restored river reach. The owner required that the design use tilted, wedge-wire river screens, mounted in the bottom of the river in a boat-passable structure.

Design of the intake structure and rehabilitation of the overall river reach was aided by two physical models—one built and operated by Colorado State University (CSU) in Fort Collins, Colo., and the other at the USBR’s Hydraulics Laboratory in Denver. The full-scale, unit-width model of the screens constructed by CSU was used to evaluate diversion capacity, sediment plugging tendencies, and air-backwash effectiveness. A much larger scale model of the river reach by the USBR was used to evaluate options for cofferdam regrading, overall reach geometry, and sediment transport characteristics.

Construction of the American River intake structure and channel was completed in late 2007. The bypass tunnel has been sealed and the river once again flows through the site.
The two physical models were complimented by computer-based numerical modeling using the BriStars sediment transport model and Flow3D, a computer-based, 3-D hydraulic model. BriStars was used to evaluate both local- and reach-scale sediment movement for single event and long-term hydrology. Flow3D was used on a macro-scale to design a boatable bypass channel of naturalistic chutes and pools and to track sediment movement to assist in the design of sediment control-structures. Flow3D was also used on a micro-scale to evaluate flow patterns and sediment movement through the intake screens.

Construction of the American River intake structure and channel was completed in late 2007. The bypass tunnel has been sealed and the river once again flows through the site. Revegetation will take several years and evidence of the dam project, which started more than 40 years ago, will always be visible. In place of the dam now stands a unique, multi-use diversion facility that not only provides a reliable water supply but also bypasses environmental base flows and allows fish and boat passage and whitewater recreation. The restored river enhances the appearance of the scarred dam construction site, and new public access facilities open the area to recreation.

George Slovensky is a senior project engineer with WHPacific, Inc., based in the firm’s Lakewood, Colo., office. He can be contacted at gslovensky@whpacific.com. WHPacific, Inc., owned by NANA Development Corporation of Anchorage, Alaska, provides engineering, architecture, surveying, and planning services to commercial and government clients nationwide. The firm has 17 offices in Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Alan Stroppini is design branch chief of the Mid-Pacific Regional Office of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in Sacramento, Calif.

 
Related Engineering Channels




Headlines From Around The Web

Paved, but Still Alive (New York Times)
Blog: Panama Canal Expansion: A Game Changer (Transportation Issues Daily)
Plans envision Pittsburgh 'Aerotropolis' (Pittsburgh Business Times)
GAI Consultants Makes Acquisition (Inside Indiana Business)






Current Issue


Exclusive

Civil engineering industry outlook - Part 2

Architecture, engineering, planning (A/E/P) and environmental consulting firms offer a broad spectrum of services within the engineering design and construction industry. For civil engineering (and many multi-discipline) firms, important markets include transportation, water/wastewater, environmental, and power and energy. Following are brief summaries of these market sector outlooks excerpted from ZweigWhite's "2012 A/E/P and Environmental Consulting Industry Outlook"


News



New & Noteworthy


Progressive Engineering


Editor's Comment


ZweigWhite Upcoming Events

National Infrastructure Renewal Summit
Date: June 3, 2012 - June 5, 2012
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Florida


Events